Skip to main content

Posts

Featured

PROTEST AND PERFORMANCE

We have seen words to be suspicious previously. The present discussion emerges in its continuation. The dissemination of meaning(s) has been an eventful part of recent socio-cultural history. More than anything else, its primary contribution has been towards inducing the academic world with words overlapped with intelligentsia-induced multiplicity of meanings. A specific mathematical set of words can be defined characteristically to be in dire need of elaborate annotations. Even the possible logics of defense that can be brought forth by propagators of subjectivism falls flat here. Meanings of words used in critical discourse of the social sciences lack correspondence to the general population. Although it is true that disciplinary specialization calls for specification in terminology, that is not the case here. Meanings to various words (either coined, doctored, or shifted semantically) serve a characteristic monopoly correspondence to their authors. Not going into a scrupulous survey

Latest posts

The problem with words

ŚABDA